The question was debated at a lively and sometimes raucous public hearing on the future of cell service in the village. Also of concern: Possible health effects from cell tower radiation.
I went and observed. The village trustees seemed bored and annoyed. Whatever the principal / agent relationship these elected representatives are meant to have with residents of Croton, is clearly not there. They have no trust. They were defensive and combative.
Yes, I think that describes the situation very well. As usual Pugh did the worst job of masking his disdain for anyone who shows up to challenge what he and the Board have already decided will be done. His arrogance is remarkable.
Does anyone have any info on the rulings or other references made by Signe Bergstrom at the meeting? It sounds like there is some real science behind what is being said, but id love to see it. So far, I have yet to see any real indication/proof of danger posed by 5G at the powers were talking about, or any other forms of related radiation, but I'm open to having my mind changed. Thanks in advance!
I'm just looking for the documents that were referred to, and the scientific evidence the FCC is purported to have ignored. I'm open to having my mind changed by the facts!
Thanks. Separate from your help I found the judgement that is being referred to, and it appears to give names of scientific journal articles which I will try to get my hands on and review.
I went and observed. The village trustees seemed bored and annoyed. Whatever the principal / agent relationship these elected representatives are meant to have with residents of Croton, is clearly not there. They have no trust. They were defensive and combative.
Yes, I think that describes the situation very well. As usual Pugh did the worst job of masking his disdain for anyone who shows up to challenge what he and the Board have already decided will be done. His arrogance is remarkable.
Thank you for the very thorough summary of last night's events.
Does anyone have any info on the rulings or other references made by Signe Bergstrom at the meeting? It sounds like there is some real science behind what is being said, but id love to see it. So far, I have yet to see any real indication/proof of danger posed by 5G at the powers were talking about, or any other forms of related radiation, but I'm open to having my mind changed. Thanks in advance!
It’s a controversial subject and I personally am not out to change anyone’s mind about it. But perhaps others might have thoughts.
I'm just looking for the documents that were referred to, and the scientific evidence the FCC is purported to have ignored. I'm open to having my mind changed by the facts!
This is a good place to start ---you may have to copy and paste this link into your browser:
https://ehtrust.org/court-judgment-on-fccs-record-review-of-1996-wireless-radiation-standards/#:~:text=After%20reviewing%20more%20than%2014%2C000%20pages%20of%20petitioners%E2%80%99,limits%20for%20wireless%20radiation%20was%20%E2%80%9Carbitrary%20and%20capricious.%E2%80%9D
Thanks. Separate from your help I found the judgement that is being referred to, and it appears to give names of scientific journal articles which I will try to get my hands on and review.
You might try archive.org
They are a treasure trove.