The Croton Chronicle

The Croton Chronicle

Share this post

The Croton Chronicle
The Croton Chronicle
Parents Defending Education opposes Croton-Harmon district's request for more time to respond to preliminary injunction motion; Judge orders a conference on the matter for Thurs July 11.
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Parents Defending Education opposes Croton-Harmon district's request for more time to respond to preliminary injunction motion; Judge orders a conference on the matter for Thurs July 11.

A PDE attorney writes Judge Seibel to argue that its motion for a preliminary injunction should not be delayed until Aug 15.

Michael Balter's avatar
Michael Balter
Jul 06, 2024
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

The Croton Chronicle
The Croton Chronicle
Parents Defending Education opposes Croton-Harmon district's request for more time to respond to preliminary injunction motion; Judge orders a conference on the matter for Thurs July 11.
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
PDE attorney J. Michael Connolly (left) and U.S. district judge Cathey Seibel (right)

In our earlier reporting and commentary on the case of Parents Defending Education v. Croton-Harmon Union Free School District et al we suggested that the district is up against a determined foe, and that school officials, district parents, and district taxpayers need to take it seriously (as opposed to glib calls to “bring it on” or comments on local Facebook groups that the case will be “quickly dismissed.”)

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The Croton Chronicle to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Michael Balter
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More