Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matthew Rawlings's avatar

On February 13th the Board of Education presented their demographic study, projecting a net increase in students, mostly due to the new housing projects in the Village. https://go.boarddocs.com/ny/chufsd/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=DBMS6B7120C7

But by April, only 2 months later, and the Board of Education was now predicting a significant decline in enrollment, instead of an increase. https://go.boarddocs.com/ny/chufsd/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=DD7RNK6EAFDA.

The Property Tax Report Card shows a 3.39% decrease in enrollment from 1,592 to 1,538. That is despite all the additional housing that has been built, Pugh's Projects, and the extra Accessory Dwelling Units. Despite all this growth, parents of a net 54 children are withdrawing them. There is more housing and children than ever, but school enrollment is decreasing.

The wealthiest and pushiest parents are going private, going to neighboring districts, registering at homes outside the district, or just moving out. My kids tell me about their friends going to Chappaqua, Briarcliff, Catholic schools, and regular private schools, but staying in the District.

At last night's BOE meeting, one parent spoke about how he believed in public education, but was withdrawing, heartbroken, to go to St Augustine's in Ossining: https://staugustineschool.org/.

For years the same old people were saying there was nothing wrong, now those same people are saying it doesn't matter there is something wrong.

One of the speakers was a Special Education teacher who has devoted her career to helping special needs kids. It is insulting our intelligence and her integrity to suggest her support for academics for all, was somehow at the cost of special education. All kids deserve an education.

So many of the people who spoke against Walker were parents who were expert educators or teachers. On one side there were teachers from Chappaqua, other local Districts, and the City, arguing against rewarding Walker's failure. These are our expert parents, taxpayers, and voters. On the other side, the usual deluded political activists, with no teaching experience, who argued in favor of rewarding Walker.

Walker has created this problem for himself by interfering with partiality in the election, as reported in this newspaper. Appearing in support of one candidate at a private event, during the election, means Walker has publicly taken sides politically. Now one side of the community is hell-bent on replacing Walker.

It doesn't help Walker that he treats local journalists so badly and doesn't respond to their enquiries. He ignores the most local of newspapers.

Every annual Board of Education election from now on is in effect a plebiscite on eliminating Walker. Every candidate will be a proxy for either giving Walker a pay rise or firing him.

Expand full comment
Jessica Dieckman's avatar

Isn’t it amazing how the board dragged out the teacher aide’s contracts for a tiny microscopic raise but didn’t bat an eye lash at a new contract for the superintendent with a very generous raise and yet he has no Phd. Do these people really think they are doing us any favors!

Expand full comment
23 more comments...

No posts